How SOME Singaporeans Are Worsening the MRT Breakdown Crisis

How SOME Singaporeans Are Worsening the MRT Breakdown Crisis


I believe we will have realistic chance at containing the MRT breakdown crisis, when people stop saying these nonsense.


I’ve been doing happy posts. Time for an angry one.

We must be balanced in what we do, yes? Balanced diet, balanced lifestyle, balanced posting?

This is with regards to what happened in Singapore on Nov 15. I.E. The latest aggravation in the MRT breakdown crisis. Tons have already been written and posted online, so I’m not going to regurgitate details or opinions. Neither am I going to deliberate on the best way forth. I think one fact that’s established, even if few Singaporeans care to acknowledge it, is how the situation is now way beyond any easy, immediate solution.

Instead, I’m going to complain and list down the ways some Singaporeans have contributed to today’s appalling situation.

Correction. It should be, how I FEEL some Singaporeans contributed to today’s situation. One must be very careful because the same people often launch lynching operations or demand police intervention for sedition.

What I have to say involves words. Accusations, sarcasm, disdain slapped about like hot dirty towels over the last ten years. Now, I’m not saying there are magical incantations flying about. If only we have such miracles in real-life. What I’m saying is that these irresponsible, often derisive statements likely reinforced the so-called toxic culture within SMRT Corporation, a situation that is now the talk of the town and a discussed topic in parliament. At their least damaging, these statements openly encouraged prolonged disregard of festering problems. At their worst, well, that’s why we are now getting floods and bumps in what was once, the pride of the country.

 

1. “Singaporeans only know how to complain!”

This is the vilest statement any Singaporean could say about his fellow citizens. The most offensive and the most derisive.

It is so because it is a statement formed from a malicious determination not to differentiate between genuine grievances, feedback, and mischievous endeavour. To the ones fond of this accusation, anyone who grouches is a complaint king. Thus, the person must be scorned and brushed aside.

What the …

Even if all of us are indeed whiners, does it change the fact that trains are breaking down several times a month? Even if all of us were to shut up, does it begin to remove all the track faults, signal faults, human faults and what have you?

Besides, when people have to spend hours each week trapped in a crawling train, when they have no assurance each workday over whether they can reach their destinations punctually, is it that wrong for them to grouch about it?

Or would these critics of Singaporeans prefer passengers to … take to the streets? As is the case in many other countries?

I think what’s happening here is this. The Singaporeans complaining about others complaining harbour a deep fantasy. One in which anyone can do anything in his or her job and never be critiqued. Admittedly, it’s a very attractive fantasy, a very Dark Side kind of thing that’s tempting to anyone. One can even say it’s only human to occasionally toy with such notions.

But, when enough people say it, when enough people keep saying it, what does it encourage? Would it then be enshrined as a universal reaction to any fault?

“The top-up machine very slow? What’s the big deal? Aiya, people only know how to complain lah!”

“Flood pumps never serviced for half a year? Aiya, what’s the big deal? People only …”

You know what I mean.

 

2. “Top Managers Are Seldom Hired For Their Technical Expertise

If (1) is the vilest, this is the most insidious. It’s insidious because it takes limited truths and magnifies them to be the only truth.

Limited truths like headhunting companies emphasise on managerial experience rather than related industry experience when searching for leaders. That bosses are not the ones holding the screwdrivers and hammers, and thus it’s unimportant for them to know the gritty “works.”

Or maybe I should say there’s no truth here at all, because do such recruitment “experts” have unblemished records of perfect placements? Does it not heavily depend on individuals, organisations, and situations? In a smooth-running company where everyone is doing what they are supposed to do, it is indeed true the boss need not know every technicality. He can comfortably focus on managing. On the other hand, if it’s a large one besieged by toxic culture …

Not convinced? Consider this. A certain corporation is not yet on the verge of collapse, but there’s certainly a lot of nonsense going on. A new manager is then assigned to salvage the situation. What would the guilty ones immediately do? What would they do before they consider audacious, maybe even borderline criminal endeavours? Would they be … bullshitting day and night to the new manager to cover up their faults? Would much of the bullshit involve bombastic technical terms and claims?

In turn, what kind of manager would most likely be bamboozled? One who has led a larger but unrelated organisation i.e. he doesn’t even know, for sure, how things actually work in the one he’s now heading. Or one who at least knows how many parts of the process there are, because once upon a time, he used to be there on the ground.

I think the answer is obvious. By the way, I’ve not been clear. This point is with regards to people still defending the current head of SMRT as an ideal leadership choice. Oh, the absurdity of it!

 

3. “If we fire them, who would do the job? We have no one!”

I jump the gun a little here. This statement is the hysterical response by some Singaporeans to calls for the top management of SMRT to (graciously) resign.

Particularly, that CEO.

I’m not too sure how to describe this response. Because it’s so nonsensical, yet in some ways, also so terrifying.

Are we saying that in our shimmering city-state of a few million people, and amidst all the accolades we regularly shower on ourselves, we don’t have other talented, capable people who could at least contain the crisis better?

To the extent, we need to continue relying on the same people who after years on the job, publically lament the ability to remedy toxic company culture?

The ability to know better when subordinates under them have been cutting corners on important task for near a year?

If so, then I think the Singapore’s future is horrifically grim. MRT breakdown or not.

So grim we ought to just forget about the whole issue, and resign ourselves to walking to school and work every day. Wait, maybe we should all just stay at home, and rot.

 

4. “Let them stay on … It’s better than finding a fresh person as replacement …”

I’d be more forgiving about this one. Because I think the Singaporeans who mouth these are victims of wistful fantasy.

The fantasy that the MRT breakdown situation will improve if we keep pressing on with whatever we are doing, the way we have been doing it.

Knead the iron rod enough and it WILL eventually become a needle! Harrumph!

Which might happen. Unfortunately, I think the polar opposite is more likely. I believe if you talk to anyone who has survived dramatic failure, they will all bemoan the same thing. Their foolishness over not biting the bullet before irreversible downfall. Do you not agree that very often, things simply don’t work out? And as the Chinese say, “short-pain-is-better-than-long-pain,” so please cut the f******* **** now so that you’d at least have a chance of recovery?

Why press on with the same when that has shown, after years, it’s not working?

And it’s not being vindictive. It is not punishment. I’d be fair and agree that at various points, the current leaders of SMRT did feel committed to improvement and they did have results to display. But ultimately, it’s minor battle victories versus a long steady decline. Maybe the task was beyond them. Maybe their personalities were just ill-suited for the challenge. Could it also be the case that replacing them is actually, a blessing to them? I mean, who likes to be shamed online every day? With all sorts of caricatures? Do you?

 

5. “Even people fall sick now and then …”

Incredibly, there are still people defending the MRT breakdown situation as inevitable. Because the system is getting old, nothing is infallible, even humans fall sick … Etc.

In Singlish, it’s normal lah! It’s expected LAH!

I’d like to ask the Singaporeans who repeat these excuses ad nauseam the following questions.

Am I right to say it is fine, maybe even entertaining, to fall sick three or four times a year? You get medical leave, chicken soup, chance to bunk in with mom and be fussed over, and so on.

On the other hand, if you are incapacitated twice every other week, sometimes multiple times within the same day, would you be running to the hospital, then howling when doctors tell you, it’s normal lah, bro! Why complain?

Like (1), such dismissal encourage a blatant culture of denial. Over time, the culture becomes a plague that diminishes any effort to cure and improve.

Please! Enough of such garbage excuses! We have denied the severity of the situation for too long. That’s why languishing in a MRT breakdown is now almost as Singaporean an experience as national service or chicken rice!

We can work together to solve this crisis. I do believe we can. For those of us not within SMRT, let’s begin by not weaving the same moronic defences again and again for those responsible for the situation.

Follow

About Scribbling Geek

The geek divides his free time between video games, movies, anime, and attempting to write decent short stories. Oh, and trying not to sprain his fingers from playing demisemiquavers on his Electone.

Thanks for commenting!